A clinical-molecular prognostic model to predict survival in patients with post polycythemia vera and post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.

Polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are myeloproliferative neoplasms with variable risk of evolution into post-PV and post-ET myelofibrosis, from now on referred to as secondary myelofibrosis (SMF). No specific tools have been defined for risk stratification in SMF. To develop a prognostic model for predicting survival, we studied 685 JAK2, CALR, and MPL annotated patients with SMF. Median survival of the whole cohort was 9.3 years (95% CI: 8-not reached-NR-). Through penalized Cox regressions we identified negative predictors of survival and according to beta risk coefficients we assigned 2 points to hemoglobin level <11 g/dl, to circulating blasts ⩾3%, and to CALR-unmutated genotype, 1 point to platelet count <150 × 109/l and to constitutional symptoms, and 0.15 points to any year of age. Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET-Prognostic Model (MYSEC-PM) allocated SMF patients into four risk categories with different survival (P<0.0001): low (median survival NR; 133 patients), intermediate-1 (9.3 years, 95% CI: 8.1-NR; 245 patients), intermediate-2 (4.4 years, 95% CI: 3.2-7.9; 126 patients), and high risk (2 years, 95% CI: 1.7-3.9; 75 patients). Finally, we found that the MYSEC-PM represents the most appropriate tool for SMF decision-making to be used in clinical and trial settings.

A phase 2 study of three low-dose intensity subcutaneous bortezomib regimens in elderly frail patients with untreated multiple myeloma.

This phase 2 trial evaluated three low-dose intensity subcutaneous bortezomib-based treatments in patients ⩾75 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients received subcutaneous bortezomib plus oral prednisone (VP, N=51) or VP plus cyclophosphamide (VCP, N=51) or VP plus melphalan (VMP, N=50), followed by bortezomib maintenance, and half of the patients were frail. Response rate was 64% with VP, 67% with VCP and 86% with VMP, and very good partial response rate or better was 26%, 28.5% and 49%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 14.0, 15.2 and 17.1 months, and 2-year OS was 60%, 70% and 76% in VP, VCP, VMP, respectively. At least one drug-related grade ⩾3 non-hematologic adverse event (AE) occurred in 22% of VP, 37% of VCP and 33% of VMP patients; the discontinuation rate for AEs was 12%, 14% and 20%, and the 6-month rate of toxicity-related deaths was 4%, 4% and 8%, respectively. The most common grade ⩾3 AEs included infections (8-20%), and constitutional (10-14%) and cardiovascular events (4-12%); peripheral neuropathy was limited (4-6%). Bortezomib maintenance was effective and feasible. VP, VCP and VMP regimens demonstrated no substantial difference. Yet, toxicity was higher with VMP, suggesting that a two-drug combination followed by maintenance should be preferred in frail patients.

Lenalidomide-prednisone induction followed by lenalidomide-melphalan-prednisone consolidation and lenalidomide-prednisone maintenance in newly diagnosed elderly unfit myeloma patients.

This multicenter phase II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide-prednisone (RP) induction, followed by lenalidomide-melphalan-prednisone (MPR) consolidation and RP maintenance in elderly unfit newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Patients received four 28-day RP induction courses (lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-21 and prednisone 50 mg three times/week), followed by six 28-day MPR consolidation cycles (melphalan 2 mg, prednisone 50 mg three times/week and lenalidomide 10-15 mg/day on days 1-21), and maintenance with lenalidomide (10 mg/day on days 1-21 every 28 days) plus prednisone (25 mg three times/week). Forty-six patients were enrolled. Median age was 75 years, 59% of patients had at least one comorbidity and 35% at least two. Partial response rate was 80%, including 29% very good partial response. Median time to progression was 19.6 months, median progression-free survival was 18.4 months and 2-year overall survival was 80%. At the tolerated consolidation dose (melphalan 25 mg/month and lenalidomide 10 mg/day), the most frequent grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (36.4%), anemia (12.1%), cutaneous reactions (18.2%) and infections (12.1%). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 12.1% of patients. In conclusion, RP induction followed by MPR consolidation and RP maintenance showed a manageable safety profile, and reduced the risk of severe hematological toxicity in unfit elderly myeloma patients.

Previous thalidomide therapy may not affect lenalidomide response and outcome in relapse or refractory multiple myeloma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Lenalidomide is a thalidomide analogue, designed to have improved efficacy and tolerability over the parent drug. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to evaluate the impact of thalidomide therapy on lenalidomide response and outcome in relapse or refractory multiple myeloma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 106 relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients received lenalidomide 25mg plus dexamethasone as salvage therapy; 80 patients progressed on thalidomide treatment (thalidomide-resistant) and 26 patients discontinued thalidomide in at least partial remission (thalidomide-sensitive). Median time from diagnosis to lenalidomide treatment was 57 months. Median prior lines of therapies were 3, range 1-6. 62% of patients were previously treated with autologous stem cell transplantation, and 71% with bortezomib-based regimens. RESULTS: In the thalidomide-resistant and -sensitive groups, the at least partial response rates were 56.2% and 61.5% (P = .45), including at least VGPR rates of 16.2% and 11.5%; the median progression free survival was 10 and 12 months (P=.12) and the median overall survival was 17 and 18.5 months (P = .50), respectively. CONCLUSION: Lenalidomide may be equally effective in heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma patients who are thalidomide-resistant or thalidomide-sensitive to a previous therapy.

Vinorelbine and prednisone in frail elderly patients with intermediate-high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.

BACKGROUND: Frail patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are generally excluded from clinical trials and not even treated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of vinorelbine and prednisone in frail elderly patients with NHL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive frail elderly patients were entered in a phase II study with vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8 and oral prednisone 30 mg total dose on days 1-8 for six cycles. Criteria of frailty were age > or =80 years, or age > or =70 years and three or more comorbidities of grade 3 or at least one comorbidity of grade 4 according to the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), or not self-sufficient or the presence of one or more geriatric syndromes. RESULTS: Of 30 evaluable patients, three (10.0%) achieved a complete response (CR), nine (30.0%) showed a partial response (PR), while 10 presented with stable disease and eight with progressive disease. The median duration of CR was 29 months (range 5-36 months), and the median duration of PR was 1 month (range 1-22 months). Three patients had grade 3 neutropenia and one had grade 4. One grade 4 neurotoxicity was observed. Three patients died because of heart failure within 28 days of therapy, and one patient died after 4 days because of rapid progression. The median overall survival was only 10 months. CONCLUSION: Vinorelbine and prednisone is a relatively non-toxic combination with modest activity in frail patients with NHL. If initial aggressive chemotherapy has been excluded, this combination could be tried to obtain a temporary palliation.

Molecular characterization of common variable immunodeficiency-related lymphomas.

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVI) patients are at high relative risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), mainly represented by B-lineage diffuse large cell lymphomas. The molecular pathogenesis and histogenesis of CVI-related NHL are poorly understood. We have thus attempted to provide a detailed molecular characterization of their histogenesis and pathogenesis. A panel of 5 CVI-related NHL was subjected to detailed analysis of histogenetic markers (mutations of immunoglobulin variable heavy chain-IgVH and of BCL-6 genes) acquired by B-cells at the time of germinal center transit. Somatic hypermutation of IgVH and BCL-6 genes occurred in 5/5 cases; in all cases, mutations were stable with no evidence of ongoing mutation processes. In 3/5 cases, the pattern of IgVH mutations was consistent with selection and stimulation of the tumor clone by antigen. To further clarify the pathogenesis, samples were tested for inactivation by promoter hypermethylation of the genes 0(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) p1, which code for detoxifying enzymes, as well as of death-associated protein (DAP)-kinase, coding for a proapoptotic molecule. Promoter hypermethylation of MGMT, GSTp1 and DAP-kinase was detected in 2/5, 3/5 and 3/5 CVI-related NHL, respectively. Overall, these data indicate that: i) similarly to other immunodeficiency-related NHL, CVI-related NHL derive from germinal center-related B-cells, namely centrocytes or post-germinal center B-cells; ii) antigen stimulation and selection are involved in the development of at least a fraction of these cases; iii) hypermethylation of the MGMT, DAP-kinase and GSTp1 genes occurs at sustained frequencies in CVI-related NHL and may provide novel prognostic markers and therapeutic targets for the clinical management of these lymphomas.